this blog has gone dark. check the adventures of jenn I(n) R(eal) L(ife) for further updates.
ARCreader: not just in it for the freebies
Monday, May 4as i've been preparing for the ABA's Day of Education panel on Digital Content, i've been thinking a lot about the best way to talk about digital content -- including digiARCs. and it occurred to me at some point that i have a pretty clear stake in my modest proposal for the ARCreader: i'm looking for a handout.
- the Kindle is ruled out right from the start, for obvious reasons. in case you don't know those reasons, here they are: AMAZON and PROPRIETARY. as an indie bookseller, i can't in good conscience support a system that doesn't allow any other source of books to customers. there may be ways around that, but that brings us right back to AMAZON. also, MY GOD IT IS EXPENSIVE.
- the Sony eReader is, as someone put it on Twitter the other day (i'd attribute but can't remember who it was), a one trick pony. it reads books. which is great and all, but when you've got little money to spend and you're not even going to give me WiFi for what i can afford, well, that puts you out of the running.
- all those other Readers (of which there are many and soon to be even more) may be cheaper, but will they work? i couldn't find reviews compelling enough to take chances on companies i don't know and devices i haven't heard much about.
Posted by advanced.reader at 4:22 PM 0 comments
Labels: ARCreader, digital arcs
the adventures of jennIRL
Tuesday, April 28From advanced.reader |
Posted by advanced.reader at 10:00 AM 0 comments
Labels: adventures of jennIRL
ARCreader: the chicken or the egg?
Monday, April 27Let's examine the costs:
they go even further and point out that if publishers pooled their money to buy ARCreaders, they'd save even more -- the article is well worth the read. i actually think the Kindle is not a great example practically speaking (given most booksellers would rather DIE than own a Kindle, except of course GC is talking about reviewers, not necessarily booksellers, but still) but it is useful because it's on the high-end of the price range. and, GC uses a low figure for ARCs; my info stated $3 - $7. so taking that into account, this is a conservative estimate of the potential savings. so why haven't publishers done this already?
1000 reviewers
x $3/galley
x $1/ U.P.S. mailing cost
x 375 titles/year
_______________________
$1.5 million /year
That's $1.5 million a year the average major publisher is spending printing and mailing out to the same 1000 reviewers every year.
Now, let's examine how much it would cost to mail each reviewer all a Kindle, including shipping costs.
1000 reviewers
x $400 /Kindle
x $0 / galley
x $0 / U.P.S. galley mailing costs
x 375 titles/year
_______________________
$400,000
Posted by advanced.reader at 9:41 AM 0 comments
Labels: ARCreader, digital arcs
not-so-sexy vampires: THE STRAIN
Sunday, April 26Posted by advanced.reader at 11:08 AM 1 comments
Labels: chuck hogan, guillermo del toro, horror, pan's labyrinth, speculative fiction, the strain, vampires